Archive | August, 2018

Sharia: Religious Guide or Foreign Law

Sharia is a legal system, not a religious guide.  Sharia is not ‘religious law’ or a ‘spiritual guide.’  It is real law.  Sharia is Islamic law adjudicated by Islamic jurists and Islamic legal scholars.

Sharia should be compared to U.S. Federal Code, not Jewish Halakhah or Christian Canon Law.

Sharia is what all jihadis unanimously state is the thing they seek to impose on the entire world, and the blueprint by which they are fighting us.

There are two sources of sharia:  the koran and the sunnah.

According to Islam, the koran is the “uncreated word of Allah.”  Allah is the Islamic god.

According to Islam, the contents of the koran were revealed to Islam’s prophet Mohammad between the years 610 A.D. and 632 A.D. through an angel.  The koran has 114 chapters or suras which are not arranged in chronological order.

Islamic scholars have authoritatively put the chapters of the koran in chronological order, which is critical to understanding Islam, sharia, and the koran.

Allah revealed his message to Mohammad progressively over time.  In the koran (2:106, 16:101) Allah said whatever was revealed to Mohammad chronologically later overrules anything that was revealed to Mohammad earlier.

Specifically, the chronologically last sura (chapter) in the koran to discuss jihad is sura 9.  The violent verses in sura 9 calling for jihad (warfare against non-muslims) as a permanent obligation upon the muslim community until the world is conquered for Islam (9:5 and 9:29 among others), legally control earlier more peaceful sounding verses.

The koran commands muslims to wage war against non-muslims until they:  (1) convert to Islam, (2) pay the jizya (non-Muslim poll tax) and submit to sharia, or (3) are killed.

The last sura to discuss relations between muslims and non-Muslims is Sura 5.

“Take not the Jews and Christians as your friends…” (5:51)

Mohammad is considered the al Insan al Kamil in Islam – the most perfect example of a man.  If Mohammad did it or said it, it is an example for all Muslims to follow for all time. His words and deeds are recorded in the authoritative biographies (sira) and the reports (hadith) of what Mohammad did and said.

The sira and hadith make up the “sunnah.”

In Islam there are many hadith scholars, but the most authoritative is a man named Bukhari.  The second most authoritative hadith scholar is a man named Muslim.

Example:  Why is it okay for a 60 year old Muslim man to marry an 8 year old girl?  Because Mohammad married Aisha when she was six (6) years old and consummated the relationship when she was nine (9). Mohammad is the perfect example, therefore, it is a capital crime in Islam to suggest this behavior is wrong.

If Allah said it chronologically last in the Koran, Mohammad (the perfect man) said it, and Mohammad did it, how could there be confusion about war against non-muslims in sharia, which comes from the Koran and the example of what Mohammad said and did (sunnah)?

  1. “Fight and slay the unbeliever wherever you find them, capture and besiege them,  and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush (strategem of war).” (Koran 9:5)
  2. Mohammad said:  “I have been commanded to fight people until they testify there is no god but Allah and Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah.”  (Hadith reported by Bukhari and Muslim)
  3. Mohammad went out and fought many battles against non-Muslims until they converted to Islam or submitted to Islam.  Those who did neither were killed.

There is no such thing as a “different kind” of sharia which does not mandate jihad until the world is under the rule of the sharia, and there is no other legal definition of “Jihad” in sharia other than “warfare against non-Muslims.”

The hudud crimes are specifically listed in the koran (7 of them), for which the koran also provides some punishments.

These crimes are: Apostacy; Armed Robbery, Terrorism, and Perpetrating Corruption; Theft; Drinking Intoxicants; Illicit Sexual Intercourse; False Accusation of Illicit Sexual Intercourse; and Rebellion in the Land.

For instance, the punishment for hirabah (Armed Robbery et al) states:  “The punishment for those who wage war against God and His messenger and pursue corruption on earth is:  execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land (Islamic Criminal Law, The Hudud, Muhammad ‘at a Alsid Sid Ahmad, Malaysia).

Because the punishments come from Allah via the Koran, the guilty party must be punished in the manner prescribed.

A sharia judge may not show “mercy,” because that would directly contradict Allah, which is a capital crime.

Sharia is how the Islamic enemy communicates and understands the world.  This is why it is crucial to use the filter of sharia when our adversaries speak so we can properly understand what the enemy intends.

In the Sharia, “Terrorism” is killing a Muslim without right; “Human Rights” is the imposition of Sharia (per the Cairo Declaration, a formal document served to the UN by the entire Muslim world via the OIC in 1993); and “Extremism” is when a Muslim exceeds his ability or authority.

According to Islamic sharia, “Zakat is obligatory for every free Muslim (male, female, adult, or child) who has possessed a zakat-payable amount for one lunar year.”

In Koran verse 9:60 states:  “Zakah expenditures are only for the poor and for the needy and for those employed to collect Zakah and for bringing hearts together for Islam and for freeing captives or slaves and for those in debt and for the cause of Allah and for the stranded traveler – an obligation imposed by Allah . And Allah is Knowing and Wise.”

From this Koranic verse, sharia declares:  “It is obligatory to distribute one’s zakat among eight categories of recipients – meaning that zakat goes to none besides them, one-eighth of the zakat to each category.”

Sharia states the eight (8) categories are:  (1) the poor; (2) those short of money; (3) zakat workers; (4) those whose hearts are to be reconciled; (5) those purchasing their freedom; (6) those in debt; (7) those fighting for allah; (8) travellers needing money.

Specifically, category 7 is defined in sharia as:

Those Fighting for Allah.  The seventh category is those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster, but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration. They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses for the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there, even if prolonged.” [Um dat al Salik, Book H Zakat, H8.17]

This means that all sharia compliant Islamic organizations in America which accept Zakat payments, must send 1/8 of all the money they collect to support jihad.  In other words, all sharia compliant Islamic organizations in America are funding what U.S. law defines as “Terrorism.”

Sharia is real law.  Is sharia compatible with U.S. laws?

How can Sharia be so clearly defined and implemented by Islamic legal scholars and jurists around the world, taught to elementary and junior high school students in Islamic schools around the world, yet be confusing to leaders in the West?

o Win This War Americans Must Know Sharia

U.S. warfighting doctrine states that to professionally analyze a threat, you begin with how the threat defines itself and why the threat states it is fighting you.

From Al Qaeda and the Islamic State to the 9/11 attackers to the Boston Marathon bombers and jihadis killed or captured in Europe and the United States, the Islamic enemy unanimously states they are “muslims waging jihad to establish an Islamic state (caliphate) under sharia (Islamic law).”

To date, the U.S. intelligence and military community has yet to do a professional analysis of our enemy.

They have failed to read, study, and teach sharia.

This is why we are losing the war.

       

Sharia is the blueprint for how the Global Islamic Movement is fighting the war and it is the thing which the enemy seeks to impose on the world.

They tell us sharia is their goal everyday. They hold up signs, put up billboards, and put it out on television and social media. They say it in open court, they scream it in public, and thousands of speeches by Islamic scholars and leaders can be seen at places like MEMRI where they are constantly and clearly calling for warfare against non-muslims (JIHAD) until the world is under the rule of sharia.

Therefore, the professional response by U.S. military, law enforcement, intelligence professionals and leaders is to simply read Islamic law.

When a person does this they will quickly learn Al Qaeda and ISIS have never misquoted sharia to support their actions.

Crucifixion, beheading, stoning, rape, and other behaviors are all legal under sharia. But you have to read sharia to know it.

When you read sharia you will learn it is a capital crime for muslims to teach other muslims anything incorrect about Islam, and it is obligatory for muslims to lie to non-muslims when the goal is obligatory…like jihad.

Therefore, to be professional you must read authoritative books of Islamic law written by Islamic authorities for muslim audiences.

Reliance of the Traveller or The Islamic Law of Nations are a couple good places to start.

Understanding the Threat’s 3 day program for police, first responders, national guard, military, and others – “Understanding and Investigating the Jihadi Threat” – rocks people’s world because on Day 1 we lay out what sharia is, its authority in Islam, and what it says.

We use the very books and materials found in U.S. Islamic schools and mosques that muslims use to teach other muslims about Islam.

The reaction of the attendees of this training, including senior military and intelligence officials, as well as FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force agents and officers is always the same – they have never been taught the information, yet they believe it is critical to protecting their community.

Once this information is known, and professionals learn about the Muslim Brotherhood’s jihadi network in America, they put all of their experiences into perspective and can see the magnitude of the threat we face from the Islamic Movement.

Those educated about sharia and the jihadi network realize that when Islamic leaders make demands from TSA or police departments or from prisons or from local communities, they are not asking for “religious accommodations” they are demanding adherence to sharia.

Understanding the Threat is the only organization in America doing what we do.

Here are three things you can do to help grow the counter-jihad movement:

1. Use UTT resources to educate yourself and others on this threat.

2. Bring UTT’s 3-day “Understanding and Investigating the Jihadi Threat” to your area. Discuss it with your sheriff and police chief.

3. Consider for yourself or others UTT’s Train the Trainer program. This unique week-long program gives graduates the ability to teach others about the threat and defend the information from attacks from detractors.

The Incomprehensible Argument

When U.S. federal courts side with a terrorist group (Hamas/CAIR) making a legal argument that muslims must be given the opportunity to abide by foreign law (sharia), it is dangerous and absurd.  When “freedom of religion” is sited as the reason, the argument becomes incomprehensible.

While there have been many judicial rulings surrendering liberty to jihadis in the U.S., last week’s ruling by a federal judge forcing the state of Washington to serve special meals at special times during Ramadan to muslims in the state prisons is an exemplar of how sharia gets imposed in Western nations by ignorant government officials.

The most widely used text book in U.S. Islamic schools – What Islam is All About – states “Islam is not a religion, however, but a complete way of life.”

All of Islam defines Islam as a “complete way of life” governed by sharia (Islamic law).

Yet, an organization – the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) – representing the terrorist group Hamas, pushes the narrative that America must make way for sharia (Islamic law) because it is a “religious right” for muslims.

In fact, sharia is a legal system that is obligatory for muslims to obey and commands how they dress, interact with their family, how they govern, how they wage war, and includes “every field of law – public and private, national and international, together with enormous amounts of material that Westerners would not regard as law at all.” (Islam: A Sacred Law, Feisal Abdul Rauf)

For any muslim to make the argument in a U.S. federal court that muslims must be granted “privileges” because it is their “religious right” when in fact they are seeking compliance with sharia (foreign law) is an absurd legal argument.  When the argument is made by a proxy for a terrorist group and American courts rule in favor of the jihadis/terrorists, the result is the forceful compliance of sharia upon U.S. citizens inside the U.S. legal system.

Understanding The Threat Continues to Answer the Critics

Understanding The Threat Answers the Critics

UTT would like to inject some truth into this situation.

The following is a list of the common attacks UTT endures, followed by UTT’s responses:

“Guandolo has made a career out of…promoting ludicrous Islamophobic conspiracy theories.”

In fact, UTT offers $1000 cash and the removal of relevant material we teach and publish to anyone who can bring something to our attention that is not true about sharia’s authority in Islam and what it says, or about the Muslim Brotherhood’s Jihadi Movement in the United States and their modus operandi.

UTT has made this offer on TV, radio, and in direct emails to U.S. Muslim Brotherhood leadership for over 3 years.

So far…no takers.

 

“Guandolo has made a career out of demonizing Muslims…”

UTT believes speaking truth about the evil and barbaric system that is Islam’s sharia brings light to muslims trapped in this system and who are enslaved by it.  This, to us, seems the best way to demonstrate love and compassion to the muslim community, as opposed to calling a barbaric system “good” and “peaceful.”

 

“Guandolo’s trainings are little more than anti-Muslim witch-hunts.”

In fact, sheriffs, police chiefs, and prosecutors have opened cases as a direct result of UTT’s 3-day “Understanding and Investigating the Jihadi Threat” for police, intelligence professionals, and military personnel.  One police officer who attended UTT’s 3-day program identified a wanted Al Qaeda terrorist wanted by the FBI less than one week after the training, and stated UTT’s training was the reason he was able to do so.

 

“At an event in 2011, Guandolo claimed mosques were fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Property records, leadership at U.S. Islamic centers/mosques, investigation by UTT, and testimony in federal courts reveal approximately 80% of the over 3000 mosques in all 50 United States are controlled by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood calls Islamic centers/mosques the “axis” of their Movement, and their stated objective is to wage jihad to establish an Islamic State under sharia – the same objective as ISIS and Al Qaeda.

 

“Guandolo was dismissed from the FBI.”

John Guandolo left the FBI on 1 December 2008 after being recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense for a significant pay increase and significantly more responsibility.  His departure from the FBI was voluntary and honorable.

 

“Among his many bizarre and Islamophobic claims…that former CIA Director John Brennan was a secret Muslim…”

In fact, in February 2013, UTT’s John Guandolo was the first to break the story on a TV show hosted by The United West’s Tom Trento discussing U.S. government personnel with direct knowledge of John Brennan’s conversion to Islam when Mr. Brennan was the CIA Station Chief in Saudi Arabia in the 1990’s.  In June 2017, former CIA Station Chief Brad Johnson publicly stated on the Glazov Gang TV show that many people in the CIA told him they heard and knew of John Brennan’s conversion to Islam.

See the video HERE.

 

“Among his many bizarre and Islamophobic claims…that Muslims are “obligated” to lie, and that it is “unprofessional” for officials to seek information about Islam from Islamic religious leaders (imams).”

Authoritative Islamic law – sharia – mandates lying by muslims to non-muslims when the objective is obligatory.  In Islamic law, jihad is obligatory.

The Um dat al Salik (Reliance of the Traveller) is authoritative sharia approved by the highest authority in Islam – Al Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt.  It states:   “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives…it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible…and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.”

Islamic scholars and all sharia mandate lying by muslims to non-muslims when the goal is obligatory.  Advancing Islam is obligatory.  Jihad is obligatory.  Islamic leaders who know and understand sharia lie to non-muslims to advance Islam and have been caught doing so on numerous occasions.

Therefore, it is unprofessional for a non-muslim to use an Islamic scholar or Imam as the source of understanding of Islam because Islamic scholars and Imams know sharia and, therefore, understand their duty under sharia to lie to police chiefs, pastors, Members of Congress, Presidents, school board officials, and others in order to advance Islam.

 

Guandolo claims most Islamic organizations in America are a threat.

The largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history – US v Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Dallas 2008 – was the culmination of a 15 year FBI investigation.  The evidence in this case reveals there is an “Islamic Movement” in the United States primarily led by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.

The evidence also reveals the most prominent Islamic organizations in the United States are a part of this Muslim Brotherhood network whose stated objective is to wage “civilization jihad” until they establish an Islamic state (caliphate) under sharia (Islamic law).

The Muslim Brotherhood’s published By-Laws also reaffirm this.

Evidence in the US v HLF trial reveals the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood was ordered by MB headquarters in Egypt to create a Palestine Committee to be a node for the terrorist group Hamas in the United States.  The USMB created four (4) organizations to fulfill this mission, including the HLF and CAIR.

US v HLF and other evidence reveals MB groups in America include, but are not limited to:

Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)

Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)

North American Islamic Trust (NAIT)

Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)

Muslim Students Association (MSA)

Muslim American Society (MAS)

Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA)

International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT)

Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)

Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA)

 

It is UTT’s hope the reader will read and study these responses so he/she can boldly speak truth using these responses as a guide.

UTT encourages our readers and followers not to be angry with our adversaries.  They are doing what they do.  We should pity them that all they have are lies and ad hominem attacks.

They certainly do not have the truth.

The Atlantic Magazine Joins a Long Line of Media Elites Supporting Jihad & Sharia

When the President’s National Security Advisor chose the new Chief of Staff for the National Security Council, the media elites immediately launched attacks to destroy the good name and reputation of the man designated for that position – Fred Fleitz.

National Security Advisor John Bolton with the new NSC Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz

Fred Fleitz has a career of honorable service to the United States including:

* Serving in the Central Intelligence Agency for 19 years as a senior analyst with an expertise in Weapons of Mass Destruction, proliferation, and related matters

* Chief of Staff for Undersecretaries of State for Arms Control John Bolton and Robert Joseph

* Senior staff member with House Intelligence Committee and a senior adviser to the committee’s Ranking Member

* Vice President of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Fleitz regularly appears on many media outlets regarding a wide variety of national security matters.

Amidst the ad hominem attacks, the media, including Peter Beinhart at The Atlantic, revealed their ignorance or willing support for the jihadis/terrorists and their stated objectives – to establish a global Islamic State under Islamic Law (sharia).

In his article, which can be found HERE, Peter Beinhart follows the script of most in the media – he quotes the Center for Security Policy and its publications on matters of sharia and the Muslim Brotherhood’s Jihadi Movement in the U.S., and leaves the reader believing the information is rhetoric or baseless without actually addressing the matter in fact.

Specifically, Mr. Beinart fails to mention sharia is authoritatively derived from the Koran and the example of Islam’s prophet Mohammad.

Mr. Beinart fails to mention that 100% of our enemy self-identifies as “muslims waging jihad to establish an Islamic State under sharia.

Mr. Beinart fails to mention that 100% of all published sharia mandates jihad until the entire world is under sharia and 100% of sharia legally defines “jihad” ONLY as “warfare against non-muslims.”

Mr. Beinart fails to mention that it is obligatory for muslims to follow all aspects of sharia under penalty of death under the Laws of Apostasy in sharia.

Mr. Beinart also fails to mention that the evidence in the largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history (US v Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Dallas 2008) reveals the most prominent Islamic organizations in the United States are – as a matter of fact – part of a defined “movement” led by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood with the stated objective of waging “Civilization Jihad” to establish an Islamic State (caliphate) under Islamic Law (sharia).

Mr. Beinart fails to mention this is the same objective as Al Qaeda, ISIS, and every other jihadi organization on the planet.

In his article, Mr. Beinart mentions the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) as if the Center for Security Policy and Fred Fleitz have wrongly accused them of simply being Islamic.  The evidence in the 15 year FBI investigation into the Holy Land Foundation reveals the Muslim Brotherhood itself identifies ISNA and NAIT as Muslim Brotherhood entities, and the evidence demonstrates both organizations passed large sums of money directly from their accounts to Hamas leaders and Hamas organizations overseas – terrorist organizations – in violation of U.S. law.

Peter Beinart speaking at the New America Foundation

Maybe none of this should surprise us since Peter Beinart has openly defended the terrorist group Hamas, which is an inherent part of the Muslim Brotherhood.

If we analyze Mr. Beinart’s “journalistic” work, he is either demonstrating staggering incompetence as a reporter or is intentionally defending enemies of the United States.

In either case, Mr. Beinart’s defense of terrorist support organizations with a defined goal of overthrowing the U.S. government, and his ad hominem attacks on a man who has dedicated his life to public service – Fred Fleitz – is disingenuous at least, and, more realistically, seditious and intentional at its roots.

 

The Coming Calipate

The Organisation (sic) of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the largest voting block in the United Nations and is comprised of every Islamic nation on earth – 57 states.

The OIC’s Charter states one of its goals is to “promote human rights.”  What does the OIC mean by “human rights?”

We need to look no further than the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, approved by the OIC in 1990 in an Extraordinary Session of Kings and Heads of State of every Islamic nation on earth, and submitted to the United Nations in 1993 as an official document from the entire muslim world at the leadership level.

Article 2 of the Cairo Declaration states:  “…it is prohibited to take away life except for a Shari’ah prescribed reason…it is the duty of the state to safeguard (life) and it is prohibited to breach it without a Shari’ah-prescribed reason.”

Article 19 of the Cairo Declaration states:  “There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Shari’ah.”

The last two articles in the Cairo Declaration read:  “All rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah (Article 24)…The Islamic Shari’ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration (Article 25).”

This means the official legal definition of “human rights” for the entire Islamic world is “the imposition of Sharia.”

Therefore, the entire Islamic world at the Head of State and King level defines “human rights” as:  killing homosexuals; killing those who leave Islam; forcing non-muslims to convert to Islam or submit to Islam/sharia and pay the non-muslim poll tax (jizya) or be killed; allowing sex slaves to be taken by muslims; and everything else that comes with sharia.

The Islamophobia campaign is married to the Islamic Law of Slander.  Islamophobia was created by the Muslim Brotherhood’s International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) to silence all honest discussion of Islam in the West.

In sharia, “Slander” is defined as saying anything about Islam a muslim would “dislike” and it is a capital crime.

In the OIC’s 10-year plan (2005-2010) it states:

“Call upon the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers to consider the possibility of establishing an independent and permanent body to promote human rights in Member states, in accordance with the provisions of the Cairo Declaration.”

It goes on to say:

“Affirm the need to counter Islamophobia through the establishment of an observatory at the OIC General Secretariat to monitor all forms of Islamophobia…Endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments.”

So, the OIC wants to criminalize all offensive speech against Islam.

The entire leadership of the Islamic world is pursuing a line of operation that stands in direct conflict with U.S. founding principles and law.

The purpose of the Islamophobia campaign is to keep U.S. leaders from discussing sharia and its direct support for actions which are unlawful under U.S. law and to put police and investigators at the state and federal level on their heels when it comes to Islam.

One could argue this campaign has been wildly successful.

The overall objective of the OIC and its member nations is to establish an Islamic State (caliphate) under sharia (Islamic Law) – which also happens to be the same objective as Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, and every other main line Islamic organization on the planet.

Currently, Turkey is leading the effort to establish the caliphate under the banner of the OIC which, as some have said, is operating as the pseudo-caliphate.

     

Turkey’s Erdogan is positioning himself to be the Caliph with Turkey as the seat of the caliphate as it was when the last caliphate was dissolved in the 1920’s.

Why is it important for Americans to know all this?

The Global Islamic Movement is readying itself at all levels to re-establish the caliphate and, through the Islamophobia campaign, keeping the United States strategically heeled while they do it.

When the Islamic Movement establishes the caliphate, Europe will be it the crosshairs of the Caliph to be conquered and the United States will be the platform through which that goal is achieved.

The way to turn this around is to understand the threat at the local and state level so the Islamic/jihadi network inside the United States can be dismantled and defeated.

Are UK Officials More Worried About Muslim Rape Gangs OR Those Who Speak About Them

Tommy Robinson has been following, filming and reporting on muslim rape gangs for years.  He was arrested in the United Kingdom (UK) May 25, 2018 for breaching the peace after live-streaming video outside the courtroom of a trial of 26 men and 2 women charged with offenses including rape, trafficking, sexual activity with a child, child neglect, child abduction, supplying drugs and making of indecent images of children.

Robinson founded the English Defense League (EDL), an organization he developed to protect soldiers from violent muslims.  He left this group soon after its development, and is now a reporter and activist.

He exposes information about rape gangs, yet the British government works to silence free speech on the issue out of fear of being labeled “Islamophobic.”

The perpetrators of the UK Rape Gangs are muslims.

The judge in the case ordered a media blackout after Robinson’s arrest.  He is now in prison for 13 months.

Let’s understand the history of rape in Islam.

The Koran states Mohammad is an “exalted standard of character” (68:4) and a “beautiful pattern of conduct” (33:21) for Muslims to follow for all times.

The hadith is the collection of all the practices, sayings and traditions of Mohammad.  The most authoritative hadith scholar in all of Islam is a man named Bukhari, who lived in the 9th century.

Bukhari records Islam’s prophet Mohammad married Aisha when she was 6 years old, and consummated the relationship when Aisha was 9 (Bukhari 3894).

This means it is lawful under sharia for a 60 or 70 year old man to marry a 10 year old, for instance, because of the example of Islam’s Prophet.

Mohammed – the perfect example of a man in Islam – slaughtered two Jewish tribes and the remnants of a third at Khaybar, and instructed Muslims to wage jihad until the world is under Islamic rule.

After the assault on the Jews of Khaybar, Mohammad ordered Kinana bin al-Rabi be tortured until he disclosed the location of the group’s treasure.  A fire was lit on Kinana’s chest to force him to do so, and then Mohammad had him beheaded.  Mohammad then took Kinana’s wife Safiya for his own.  (Life of the Prophet, Ishaq, p. 515)

 

“We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected.  Dihya came and said, ‘O Allah’s Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.’ The Prophet said, ‘Go and take any slave girl.’ He took Safiya bint Huyai.”  (Bukhari volume 1, book 8, Hadith 367).

 

Does this mean taking captives and having sex with a nine year old is “a beautiful pattern of conduct”?

Muslim rape gangs involve teenage girls and girls as young as 9.  These girls are raped, passed around to members of a gang or family, and often sold into sex trafficking.  These girls might also be made to “recruit” other victims.

Today the “rape gangs” are often called “grooming gangs.”

The term “groomed” refers to the different types of coercion that might be used to entice the girls.  Suspects gain the girls’ cooperation by giving them drugs or alcohol, and force drugs on the girls to get them addicted so they will stay around without a fight.

Children can also be lured into a gathering where older men offer them nice things.  Sometimes older men will use young boys to lure female victims to them, and then rape the girls after they are in their control.

Peer on peer abuse is also prolific.  Younger boys will rape younger girls.  Many times victims are told if they don’t cooperate their family members will be harmed and family homes will be torched in an arson attack.  Victims are physically assaulted, and many report being raped by over 20 men at a time.

Suspects will often justify their behavior by saying the young girls are “prostitutes.”

The UK’s official response to this barbarism is to have a media blackout and underreport these crimes by ignoring the fact these assaults are perpetrated by muslims.

In the past, the U.S. response has been to regurgitate the lie that “Islam is a religion of peace” or that “Islam does not condone such behavior,” and work with the very Islamic leaders driving the jihadi network fostering barbaric behavior like child-rape.

Hollywood and the media give the rapists a soft place to land and refuse to speak truth boldly about these and other horrors coming from the Islamic community.  They instead attack those speaking truth by launching ad hominem attacks and invoking “Islamophobia” towards all who dare mention Islam in any way regarding these matters.

“I have been made victorious through terror.” – Mohammed (Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52, 220)

Tommy Robinson sits in prison in the UK for reporting on Muslim rape gangs.

Will the United States allow the same thing to happen here?  Is it happening already?

Speaking Truth Boldly is the Best Response to the Islamic Threat

The Islamic Movement uses its “Islamophobia” campaign as a hammer to impose the Islamic Law of Slander on the non-muslim world.  Slander is legally defined in Islam as saying anything about Islam that muslims would “dislike,” and is a capital crime under sharia.

The best way to counter the tidal wave of lies, deceit, and propaganda coming from Islamic leaders is to speak truth boldly without hesitation, no matter what the cost.

In the shadow of 2018’s Memorial Day when America honors it’s war dead, what better way to pay tribute to those who gave it all in the defense of freedom than to sacrifice some comfort to dare to say what is true about a barbaric and evil foe.

While people who self-identify as “muslim” may or may not adhere to sharia as required under penalty of death in Islam, their lack of adherence to sharia does not constitute a different “version” of Islam.

Islam requires muslims to submit to Allah’s sovereign law which is sharia.

All authoritatively published sharia comes from the Koran and the example of Islam’s prophet Mohammad.

There is one Quran which commands warfare against the non-muslim world until Islam (sharia) rules the world – it must because Allah’s law is perfect according to Islam.

There was only one Mohammad who is identified in the Koran as a “beautiful pattern of conduct” for all muslims to follow.  Mohammad tortured, killed, married a six year old, permitted people to be killed who mocked him, permitted sex slaves, and waged war on those who did not convert to Islam or submit to Islam.

No gray area in sharia on these matters.  Warfare against non-muslim is obligatory until the world is under sharia.

Islam divides the world into the Dar al Islam (House of Islam where sharia is the law of the land) and the Dar al Harb (House of War).  The stated purpose of Islam is to eliminate the Dar al Harb until the entire world is under the House of Islam and sharia.  The vehicle to do this is called “Jihad.”

Simple.

Many people have a hard time swallowing the simplicity of Islam’s goals for a number of reasons.  That does not change the truth.

Learn to speak the truth about this threat.  Time is running out.  As we see citizens of Europe arrested for using social media to share their views, publishing photos online, or simply standing in front of a court filming muslim gang-rapists, liberty is under assault.

The least we can do is speak truth about it.

UTT encourages you to:

  1. Learn how to respond to typical comments from ignorant people about this threat.
  2. Study sharia as it relates to this war.
  3. Purchase UTT’s books and DVD’s to learn more about this threat.
  4. Be bold and speak truth as a way to honor those who gave their lives for our liberty.

What to Make of Muslim Republican Congressional Candidate Omar Qudrat

One of the candidates for California’s 52nd Congressional District is Omar Qudrat.

Qudrat is a muslim running as a Republican who states he is against Islamic law (sharia).

U.S. Congressional Candidate for California’s 52nd District Omar Qudrat (R)

Qudrat said, “Radical Islamic terrorism is a real threat to our nation…That includes organizations that hold themselves out as advocacy groups.”

But Qudrat also says the compatibility of American “values and principles” and Islam are so seamless they are indistinguishable.

It is important to note the various strategic entities in the global Islamic Movement often appear to publicly be in conflict with each other – like when Hamas doing business as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) publicly condemns ISIS or an individual jihadi attack (San Bernadino jihadi operation).  CAIR does this so they can draw closer to local, state, and federal officials to feign concern and a desire to help.  Yet, since CAIR is a Hamas (Terrorist) group, we know their real objective is to subvert in furtherance of establishing an Islamic State under sharia.

This kind of tactic is called a Splinter Operation.  Two sides of the same enemy feign conflict to get us to draw closer to the “nicer” of the two – in this example, the suit-wearing jihadis at CAIR.

In a Splinter Movement suit-wearing jihadis like CAIR, ISNA, OIC (political) openly condemn violent jihadis like ISIS to get U.S. political officials, military, law enforcement & others to draw them in closer

Qudrat claims he is against Islamic law (sharia), yet claims Islam seamlessly flows into American principles, which is demonstrably false, since Islam and sharia cannot be separated.

While it is possible Qudrat is completely ignorant of Islamic doctrine/sharia, it is also true that every prominent muslim Republicans have let in the front door in the last 20 years has proven to be a jihadi.

Is Omar Qudrat the first exception?